Image source: www.koimoi.com
The highly anticipated Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 has arrived in theaters, but the critical reception tells a tale of horror that extends far beyond the intended scares. The sequel, which promised to dive deeper into the shadowy world of Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza, has instead found itself trapped in a nightmare of poor reviews and disappointing scores.
Set one year after Mike and Vanessa’s harrowing experience trying to protect Abby from the supernatural events that nearly destroyed them, the sequel sees Abby mysteriously drawn back to the animatronic world of Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy. Her return awakens buried secrets within the Fazbear legacy, promising fans the wild continuation they’ve been eagerly awaiting.
However, the early critical response paints a far more chilling picture than any jump scare the film could deliver. The Rotten Tomatoes score has landed at a devastating 11% from 53 reviews, placing the sequel in uncomfortable company with some of 2025’s most critically panned horror releases.
This represents a significant drop from the original film’s already modest 33% critics score, though notably, the first movie managed to capture audiences with an impressive 86% audience score. The stark contrast between critical and fan reception for the original film offers a glimmer of hope that the sequel might find redemption with its core fanbase.
The current score places Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 alongside other poorly received horror titles like The Ritual at 9% and Bloat at 29% – certainly not the neighborhood any major studio hopes to find their big-budget sequel occupying. While the audience score remains unavailable at the time of this writing, the studio and fans alike are holding their breath for a potential repeat of the dramatic score split that characterized the original film’s reception.
Critics have been particularly harsh in their assessment of the sequel’s fundamental elements. Many reviews point to weak scares that fail to deliver the tension and terror that horror fans expect from a franchise built on jump scares and psychological dread. The film’s pacing has come under heavy fire, with several critics describing it as sluggish and failing to maintain the momentum necessary for effective horror storytelling.
Perhaps most damaging to the sequel’s reception is the widespread criticism of its convoluted plot. Multiple reviewers have noted that the film struggles with narrative coherence, weighed down by what some describe as “game logic” that translates poorly from interactive medium to passive film viewing. The story’s odd diversions and tangled plot threads have left many critics feeling confused rather than frightened.
The predictability of the scares has emerged as another major point of criticism. Several reviews describe the horror elements as “too soft” and lacking the lasting impact that defines memorable horror cinema. For a franchise built on the foundation of creating genuine fear and suspense, these critiques strike at the very heart of what Five Nights at Freddy’s aims to achieve.
Despite the overwhelmingly negative critical consensus, the film hasn’t been without its defenders. A handful of reviews have praised the sequel’s improved practical effects and more substantial animatronic villains. These positive voices highlight enhanced fan service elements that demonstrate a clear understanding of what the franchise’s dedicated fanbase desires.
Even the more favorable reviews come with significant caveats, however. Critics who found elements to appreciate still acknowledge that the film struggles with focus and relies heavily on its built-in audience rather than crafting a story that could appeal to broader horror fans or mainstream moviegoers.
Behind the camera, Emma Tammi returns to direct the sequel, working from a script by series creator Scott Cawthon. This creative continuity was intended to ensure consistency with the original film’s vision, though the critical response suggests that repeating the same approach may have amplified rather than addressed the first film’s perceived weaknesses.
The cast brings together returning favorites and exciting new additions. Piper Rubio reprises her role as Abby Schmidt, while Josh Hutcherson, Elizabeth Lail, Matthew Lillard, Theodus Crane, and Kellen Goff all return from the original film. The sequel expands its roster with notable additions including Skeet Ulrich, McKenna Grace, Teo Briones, Freddy Carter, Wayne Knight, and Megan Fox.
In a particularly fan-friendly casting choice, Matthew “MatPat” Patrick – the popular YouTube theorist known for his extensive Five Nights at Freddy’s content – provides the voice of Toy Bonnie. This casting decision represents the kind of fan service that the more positive reviews have praised, even if it hasn’t been enough to win over critics overall.
The ambitious cast list suggests significant investment in the sequel’s potential, making the critical reception all the more disappointing for the studio and filmmakers involved. With recognizable names from both horror and mainstream entertainment, the film clearly aimed to expand beyond its core fanbase while maintaining the elements that made the original a surprise hit with audiences.
For fans of the franchise, the critical scores present a familiar dilemma. The original Five Nights at Freddy’s film demonstrated that critics and audiences can have vastly different perspectives on the same material. The 53-point gap between critic and audience scores for the first film suggests that the sequel might find similar redemption with its intended audience.
The franchise’s success has always been built on its dedicated fanbase’s enthusiasm and engagement. From the original indie game series to merchandise, books, and now films, Five Nights at Freddy’s has proven remarkably resilient in the face of critical skepticism. The question now becomes whether that resilience can overcome what appears to be an even steeper critical hill to climb.
Industry observers are watching closely to see how the box office performance correlates with the critical reception. The original film’s commercial success despite mixed critical reviews demonstrated the power of a passionate fanbase, but sequels face different expectations and often lack the novelty factor that can drive curious moviegoers to theaters.
The 11% Rotten Tomatoes score represents more than just a number – it reflects a critical consensus that the sequel has failed to address the fundamental issues that prevented the original from achieving broader critical acclaim. Whether this matters to the film’s ultimate success will depend largely on how successfully it connects with the audience that made the first film a commercial triumph.
As Five Nights at Freddy’s 2 continues its theatrical run, the real test will come from audience reactions and word-of-mouth recommendations. The franchise has always been about the fans, and their verdict may prove far more important than any critical consensus. For now, the sequel stands as a film built primarily for its loyal followers, waiting to see if that foundation proves strong enough to support its continued success despite the critical challenges it faces.
About the Author
